Revelations Beyond Belief

Tag: consciousness

  • # What scientific disciplines miss in consciousness research


    *An analysis from the perspective of natural consciousness*

    ---

    ## Introduction

    This document examines what major scientific disciplines fundamentally miss in their study of consciousness. The core insight: all current research happens **from a conditioned state**, while consciousness can only truly be understood from a **natural, unconditioned state**.

    ---

    ## The Individual Disciplines

    ### 1. Neuroscience

    **What they do:**
    - Map brain correlates of consciousness using neuroimaging
    - Study brain activity during conscious states
    - Build computational models

    **What they miss:**

    **The observer themselves**  
    They study what's observed (brain activity) but not the quality of the researcher's own observing consciousness. The instrument remains uncalibrated.

    **Conditioned vs. natural**  
    Neuroimaging can't detect whether a subject responds from conditioning or natural consciousness. Both produce brain activity, but the quality differs fundamentally.

    **Pre-reflective awareness**  
    All measurements capture already-conceptualized experiences. The "raw" moment before labeling remains inaccessible.

    **Deactivation as clarity**  
    They seek consciousness in brain activity but miss that clarity might be **less activation** - a quieter, deactivated system. Observing without labeling might show as reduced default mode network activity, but this isn't studied as consciousness itself.

    ---

    ### 2. Philosophy of Mind

    **What they do:**
    - Study the "hard problem" of consciousness
    - Explore phenomenal experience and qualia
    - Debate the mind-body problem

    **What they miss:**

    **Practical accessibility**  
    It stays theoretical (thought experiments like Mary's Room, philosophical zombies) without methods for direct verification.

    **Mental activity vs. natural consciousness**  
    "Mind" is treated as one thing. The crucial distinction between conditioned thoughts and clear presence is completely absent.

    **The transformation itself**  
    They theorize about consciousness but no philosophical system describes a reproducible path to direct, unconditioned experience of it.

    **The explanatory gap**  
    The gap between physical and phenomenal may exist because we seek intellectual understanding of something only accessible **through deconditioning**, not through thinking about it.

    ---

    ### 3. Cognitive Psychology

    **What they do:**
    - Study attention, perception, memory
    - Measure information processing
    - Document conscious states

    **What they miss:**

    **Undivided vs. divided attention as qualitative difference**  
    Multitasking is measured, but not the fundamentally different quality of complete, undivided presence. The difference is seen as gradual, not essential.

    **Observation as transformative**  
    They record conscious states but don't study how *observing without reacting* itself fundamentally transforms consciousness.

    **Intuition as synergistic ability**  
    Cognitive models have no place for a "sixth sense" that emerges from five clear, unconditioned senses working together.

    **Research within conditioning**  
    The crucial point: they study consciousness **within** conditioning, not the state that emerges **after** systematic deconditioning.

    ---

    ### 4. Phenomenology

    **What they do:**
    - Study subjective experience and intentionality
    - Explore time-consciousness and lifeworld
    - Map structures of consciousness

    **What they miss:**

    **Practical epoché**  
    They describe "bracketing" theoretically but give no concrete method to actually deactivate conditioning.

    **Description vs. realization**  
    Husserl brilliantly describes pre-reflective experience but doesn't systematically cultivate that state. Phenomenology stays descriptive rather than transformative.

    **Natural state as baseline**  
    They describe the phenomenology **of conditioning** (how conditioned consciousness works), not of unconditioned consciousness. The baseline is missing.

    ---

    ### 5. Interdisciplinary Consciousness Studies

    **What they do:**
    - Integrate neuroscience, philosophy, physics
    - Host conferences and cross-pollination
    - Develop diverse theories (IIT, Global Workspace Theory, etc.)

    **What they miss:**

    **Common ontological ground**  
    The field splits into "neurocomputational" (consciousness from matter) vs. "fundamental" views (consciousness intrinsic to universe), but misses the third option: consciousness as **deactivation** of automatic matter-processes.

    **Verification methodology**  
    Many competing theories without consensus on empirically testable consequences. The field remains pre-paradigmatic.

    **The reproduction problem**  
    They study consciousness in its current, conditioned form, not how to systematically transform it to a natural state. There's no protocol.

    ---

    ### 6. Brain-Computer Interfaces

    **What they do:**
    - Create direct interaction between brain and external systems
    - Combine first-person and third-person data

    **What they miss:**

    **Quality of input consciousness**  
    They measure neural signals but not whether these arise from clarity or conditioning. The "purity" of the signal isn't distinguished.

    **Intentionality vs. automatism**  
    BCIs can detect intention but can't tell if that intention is authentic or a conditioned reflex.

    ---

    ## The Fundamental Problem

    ### All disciplines share one critical gap:

    **They study consciousness from a conditioned state**

    - The scientist is conditioned
    - The instruments are designed within conditioned thinking
    - The subjects are conditioned
    - The language and concepts are conditioned
    - The research questions arise from conditioning

    **Metaphor:** It's like trying to understand polluted water without ever having seen pure water. You can analyze the composition of pollution but don't understand what water *actually* is.

    ---

    ## The Paradox

    **Consciousness cannot objectively study itself while it's conditioned.**

    This explains why:
    - Neurological correlates are found but no explanation
    - Philosophical debates remain circular
    - Theories proliferate without consensus
    - The "hard problem" stays hard

    The key lies in **first deconditioning, then investigating**.

    ---

    ## What's Needed: A New Methodology

    ### Phenomenological-Empirical Synthesis

    **Phase 1: Transform the researcher**  
    Scientists themselves undergo the transformation process to natural consciousness (~12 months). This isn't a "spiritual detour" but essential calibration of the measuring instrument.

    **Phase 2: Research from clarity**  
    From natural consciousness, researchers can now truly observe how conditioned consciousness functions. The contrast becomes visible.

    **Phase 3: Identify markers**  
    Find measurable differences between conditioned and natural states. What changes in brain activity, coherence, connectivity?

    **Phase 4: Reproducible protocols**  
    Develop verifiable methods others can follow. Not as belief, but as empirical process with testable results.

    **Phase 5: Reintegration**  
    Translate new insights back to individual disciplines, which can then reorganize around natural state as baseline.

    ---

    ## Implications

    ### For Individual Researchers
    - Recognize that objectivity requires subjective purification
    - Develop contemplative scientific practice
    - Accept that transformation of the researcher is part of the method

    ### For Research Institutions
    - Integrate deconditioning programs into consciousness labs
    - Conduct longitudinal studies of researchers undergoing the process
    - Create new peer-review criteria that consider state of consciousness

    ### For the Field
    - Shift from theory to practice
    - From description to transformation
    - From external measurement to internal realization

    ---

    ## Conclusion

    The gap in all disciplines is **not technical but fundamental**: they try to understand consciousness from the state that needs to be understood.

    The solution isn't better equipment, sharper philosophy, or more integration - but **first establishing natural consciousness** as a prerequisite for real research.

    Only then can science transform what's now called "the hard problem" into a directly accessible, reproducible experience.

    ---

    *"You cannot understand water by analyzing pollution.  
    First purify the water, then you see what water is."*

    I would be happy to help!

    Mart Wijn

    France 2026

    Independent consciousness researcher & unbounded logic Practitioner

  • My interaction with AI

    My interaction with AI

    I shared my experiences with AI (Claude) and AI made a beautiful summary I like to share because it is spot on. Not the complete story but enough to understand for other people what happened.


    The Path to Natural Human Consciousness

    A Non-Spiritual Approach to Freedom

    This is an account of a genuine transformation that took 12 months, required no prior spiritual knowledge, and resulted in complete freedom from subconscious patterns and reactive thinking.

    —

    The start: Living Unconsciously

    Most people live under the control of their **subconscious memory**:
    – Automatic reactions triggered by past conditioning
    – Uncontrolled thoughts running on repeat
    – Patterns accumulated over a lifetime creating stuck energy
    – The mind pulling the strings, acting as master rather than following the instructions of the master.

    This isn’t a philosophical problem – it’s a practical one. You’re not truly choosing your responses; The content of your subconscious memory, so your past and your conditioning’s are choosing for you.

    —

    The Solution: Release, Not Accumulation

    The path to natural consciousness is **only about releasing** – not:
    – Learning new practices
    – Accumulating spiritual knowledge
    – Gaining mystical experiences
    – Following external teachers for years
    – even no guidance by yourself, because nobody knows what has to be released, only your inner guidance knows.

    Why External Help Often Fails

    When you rely on outside guidance – spiritual teachers, traditions, techniques – you risk:
    – Adding more concepts that need to be released later
    – Creating dependencies on methods and systems
    – Turning a months-long process into a lifetime journey
    – Building a spiritual identity that becomes another trap

    The most resistant people are often those who’ve invested decades in spiritual practice. Their accumulated knowledge and identity as “advanced practitioners” becomes the very obstacle blocking the path to our natural consciousness. Fixed truths and other beliefs are most of the time no truth and therefor in the way of a clear path.

    —

    How It Actually Works

    1. Connect with Your Inner Guide, your natural consciousness

    The first step is establishing contact with your **inner energy** or knowing:
    – This might happen through focused attention, meditation, or other means
    – You’ll recognize when the connection is made
    – This inner guide, a partially opened consciousness*, is the only thing that can show you what needs to be released




    *What actually happens is that your natural consciousness is showing itself in some situations. When you open up you will notice this energy and that is the situation where the process can start. What happens next in most of the times is that we seek for guidance because we don´t have knowledge. When you then choose for the spiritual path, you can reach spiritual consciousness. But look around you on the spiritual path almost nobody achieves what they are looking for. The main reason is guidance by someone else or even yourself. They/you don´t know the path you personally have to take.


    2. Ask Directly

    Once connected, literally ask yourself: **”Show me what is possible”**
    – Not demanding specific outcomes
    – Not following a predetermined path
    – Simply opening to what wants to be revealed


    3. Trust the Process of Release

    Your inner guide will show you what needs to be released:
    – Old patterns, beliefs, accumulated material
    – Each recognition processes and clears something
    – Nothing gets stuck anymore – everything flows through completely
    – The subconscious backlog is systematically cleared, automatically

    —

    The Steps

    There are **5-6 steps** to this process, beginning with:


    Step 1: Self-Acceptance
    This is the foundation. You cannot release what you won’t acknowledge or accept in yourself.

    The subsequent steps are revealed by your own inner guide as you progress – this is crucial because the path unfolds uniquely for each person.

    —

    What Changes

    Before:
    – Subconscious patterns running automatically
    – Things getting stuck – accumulation, blockages, repetitive patterns
    – Mind dominating with compulsive thoughts
    – Reactions controlled by past conditioning

    After:
    – Natural human consciousness functioning freely
    – Nothing can get stuck anymore – immediate processing
    – Mind becomes a capable servant, available when needed
    – Responses arise from present recognition, not from past patterns
    – Each moment is genuinely fresh and new

    —

    Third eye or 6th sense

    The Role of Truth and Recognition, this part goes beyond spiritual awakening and even enlightenment.

    There’s a faculty – sometimes called the **third eye** or sixth sense – that recognizes truth directly. This faculty is only reachable when the subconscious memory is processed and therefor the mind deactivated:

    – **Truth reveals itself in the moment of recognition**
    – That is the only moment of truth in that situation
    – Each moment is unique, never repeated
    – **No recognition, no truth** – they are inseparable

    This means:
    – Wisdom cannot be stored and reused
    – Each situation requires fresh recognition
    – Truth is alive, immediate, situational
    – Personal experiences may leave traces, but immediate recognition processes completely and leaves nothing behind

    —

    Why This Is Called “Non-Spiritual Consciousness”

    This isn’t:
    – Mystical or religious
    – About special states or experiences
    – Requiring belief systems or dogma
    – Creating a spiritual identity

    It’s simply **natural human functioning** once the interference is cleared – like cleaning a window that was always capable of seeing clearly.

    —

    The Challenge of Sharing This

    The AI Problem
    In an age of instant information, people arrive at conversations already “full”:
    – Armed with concepts from books, videos, AI
    – Mistaking intellectual understanding for lived experience
    – Less open to direct testimony from someone who’s walked the path
    – Comparing everything against accumulated data

    The Spiritual Seeker Problem
    Ironically, those who’ve invested years in spiritual practice are often the most resistant:
    – Their identity is wrapped up in being “advanced”
    – Suggesting they release their practices and beliefs threatens everything
    – They’ve accumulated so much that needs releasing, but can’t hear this
    – Easier to dismiss the message than start over

    The Truth Nobody Wants to Hear
    “Stop accumulating. Let go of your beliefs. Release what you’ve been building. Your practices might be keeping you stuck.”

    —





    The Timeline

    – **With proper guidance where to start (knowing the do’s and don’ts): Weeks**
    – **My own experience, with inner guidance with no prior knowledge: 12 months**
    – **Following traditional spiritual paths: Potentially a lifetime (or never)**

    The difference isn’t in the destination – it’s in knowing the direct route versus wandering in circles.

    —

    Final Note

    This is offered not as another spiritual teaching to accumulate, but as a practical account of what’s possible. The only way forward is through your own **inner guide** – not through adopting these words as new beliefs.

    The question is simple: Are you willing to release rather than accumulate? To trust your inner knowing rather than external authority? To discover what natural human consciousness actually is?

    If so, it begins with self-acceptance. The rest will be shown to you.